8.CULTURAL FIT BETWEEN ORGANIZATION AND THE MEMBERS

 

Cultural fit and diversity are not the same but closely related components of a healthy workplace 

environment. Culture fit centers on aligning employees with the organization's values, mission, and working style. It promotes cohesion and a shared sense of purpose.

On the other hand, diversity emphasizes differences in backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences among team members. While a strong culture fit is essential for alignment and teamwork, a diverse workforce contributes a broader range of ideas and creativity. The key is to strike a balance where culture fit ensures cohesion while diversity fuels innovation, creating a dynamic and inclusive workplace.

There are many practices within an organization that tend to keep a culture alive and measure the cultural fit between the organization and its employees. Many of the human resource practices such as selection, performance appraisal, training, and career development reinforce the organization's culture. Organizational beliefs also tend to influence the work norms, communication practices, and philosophical stances of employees. 

Organizations use a process called socialization to adapt new employees to the organization's culture. If employees do not adapt well, they feel increasing pressure from supervisors and from coworkers who are better acculturated. They might stay and fight, stay and become isolated, or leave the organization, voluntarily or involuntarily, and look for a different organization whose culture they fit better.

In contrast, employees who understand and share the organization's values have a better basis for making choices that match the firm's goals. Many organizations compete through innovation. When most employees understand and support the organization's expectations, less time is spent explaining, instructing, and building consensus before trying something innovative. 

Moreover, the error level will be lower in most cases. Employees who are well acculturated also find their work more meaningful: They are part of, and contributing to, something larger than themselves. Thus, a good cultural fit between employees and the organization contributes to employee retention, organizational productivity, and profit.

A culture fit assessment is a structured interview process or set of methods used by organizations to evaluate how well a potential or existing employee aligns with the company's culture. It typically involves various tools and techniques designed to measure an individual's compatibility with the organization's values, behaviors, and work environment. Culture fit assessments may include:

1. Interviews: Asking questions that assess a candidate's values, work style, and how they might contribute to the company culture.
2. Questionnaires or surveys: Administering written assessments to gauge a person's preferences, beliefs, and compatibility with the organization's culture.
3. Role-play or scenario testing: Presenting real-life work scenarios to assess how a candidate or employee would respond and whether their actions align with the company's values.
4. Observation: Observing how a person interacts with current employees or engages in group activities to gauge their social and cultural compatibility.
5. Cultural fit metrics: Using data analytics to track and measure various cultural fit indicators, such as employee turnover, engagement levels, and performance metrics.

A successful culture fit assessment helps managers ensure that employees perform well in their roles and contribute positively to the overall workplace culture, enhancing collaboration, job satisfaction, and overall company success.

Importance of culture surveys in measuring employee culture fit

Culture surveys are indispensable tools for assessing and measuring organizational culture fit. They offer a quantitative and structured research approach to gaining insights into how employees interact, perceive, and experience the company's culture. By collecting data through surveys, companies can objectively gauge the extent of alignment between their employees' values, behaviors, and the established culture.

These surveys provide employees with a platform to express their opinions, concerns, and suggestions about the culture, giving them a voice in shaping the workplace environment. Over time, repeated surveys create benchmarks that allow organizations to track changes in culture fit and assess the effectiveness of culture-related initiatives.

Culture surveys also play a crucial role in identifying specific problem areas within the culture. Whether it's communication, leadership, diversity, or work-life balance issues, surveys pinpoint areas that may need attention and improvement. Moreover, they help organizations understand the impact of culture fit on retention and employee engagement.

By assessing culture fit, organizations ensure that their culture aligns with their strategic goals, ultimately driving success. With the ability to customize surveys, organizations can focus on specific aspects of cultural fit that are of particular interest or concern.

Conclusion

Culture fit is not a mere buzzword; it's a fundamental element of a thriving workplace. Assessing and nurturing culture fit through surveys is not only a smart business practice but a crucial one. It empowers organizations to create environments where employees can genuinely connect with the company's values and mission, driving engagement, retention, and overall success.

The insights gleaned from culture surveys are invaluable in shaping a dynamic and inclusive culture that reflects the ever-evolving needs and expectations of both employees and the organization. By listening to the voices of those who make a workplace what it is, companies can ensure they are on the right track to fostering a culture that inspires and empowers everyone within their ranks.

References:

Case, J. (2005, March). The power of listening. Inc. Magazine, 76–85.

Chaleff, I. (2009). The courageous follower: Standing up to and for our leaders. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

Chandler, G., Keller, C., & Lyon, D. (2000). Unraveling the determinants and consequences of innovation-supportive organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(1), 59–77.

Chawla, A., & Kelloway, E. K. (2004). Predicting openness and commitment to change. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 25(5/6), 485–502.

Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. (2004). Repairing the breach of trust in corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(2),143–152.

Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Cohen, A., & Bradford, D. (2005). Influence without authority (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Collins, J. (2001a, October). Good to great. Fast Company, 38–45.

Collins, J. (2001b). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap…and others don’t. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.

Collins, J., & Porras, J. (1994). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.

Cook, K. (2001). Trust in society. New York, NY: Russell Sage.

Covey, S. (1989). The seven habits of highly effective people. New York, NY: Free Press.

Currall, S., & Epstein, M. (2003). The fragility of organizational trust: Lessons from the rise and fall of Enron. Organizational Dynamics, 32(2), 193–213.

Das, T., & Teng, B. (2004). The risk-based view of trust: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(1), 85–101.

Davenport, T. (2009, February). How to design smart business experiments. Harvard Business Review, 87(2), 69–76.

Davis, S. (1997). What’s your emotional bandwidth? Forbes, 160(1): 233-234

DeLong, T., & Vijayaraghavan, V. (2003, June). Let’s hear it for B players. Harvard Business Review, 81(6), 96–102.